Jews have a totally different understanding of that text from Daniel. We don't even include Daniel as one of the books of the prophets,
Thanks for that info, much appreciated
Thanks for your comments Crazyguy
i been researching information on why the the conquest of canaan could not be a real historical account.
i found this on barts blog:.
when considering the historicity of the narratives of joshua, the first thing to re-emphasize is that these are not accounts written by eyewitnesses or by anyone who knew an eyewitness.
Jews have a totally different understanding of that text from Daniel. We don't even include Daniel as one of the books of the prophets,
Thanks for that info, much appreciated
Thanks for your comments Crazyguy
i been researching information on why the the conquest of canaan could not be a real historical account.
i found this on barts blog:.
when considering the historicity of the narratives of joshua, the first thing to re-emphasize is that these are not accounts written by eyewitnesses or by anyone who knew an eyewitness.
Thanks for your explanation.
How do the Jews feel about the prophecy in Daniel regarding the Messiah. Do they feel it will still be fulfilled in the future?
(Daniel 9:24-26) . .
There are seventy weeks that have been determined upon your people and upon your holy city, in order to terminate the transgression, and to finish off sin, and to make atonement for error, and to bring in righteousness for times indefinite, 25 And you should know and have the insight [that] from the going forth of [the] word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until Mes·si′ah [the] Leader, there will be seven weeks, also sixty-two weeks. 26 “And after the sixty-two weeks Mes·si′ah will be cut off, with nothing for himself.. . .
i been researching information on why the the conquest of canaan could not be a real historical account.
i found this on barts blog:.
when considering the historicity of the narratives of joshua, the first thing to re-emphasize is that these are not accounts written by eyewitnesses or by anyone who knew an eyewitness.
Unlike Fundamentalist Christian religion which demands the Bible be a literal account, Jews view their Scriptures much like Americans view their historical legends.
How do Jews view the book
of JOB? What does it teach? I know it is not a literal account.
It is highly illogical to judge the texts of the Jews by the interpretation of Gentiles who hold the same Jews as incapable of understanding their own texts
LOL!
i been researching information on why the the conquest of canaan could not be a real historical account.
i found this on barts blog:.
when considering the historicity of the narratives of joshua, the first thing to re-emphasize is that these are not accounts written by eyewitnesses or by anyone who knew an eyewitness.
i been researching information on why the the conquest of canaan could not be a real historical account.
i found this on barts blog:.
when considering the historicity of the narratives of joshua, the first thing to re-emphasize is that these are not accounts written by eyewitnesses or by anyone who knew an eyewitness.
Archeologists have come to the conclusion that most of the people we refure to as Israelites were in fact cannaanites with possible mix of some refugee of other races settling into the area.
I was thinking of that as an explanation.
I wonder what the motive was for whoever wrote the account in Joshua, to elevate the Israelites? And why did the other people living in Canaan not object when they read the makeup account? It would have been easy for them to call the accounts a lie and write their own version of what really happened. Why didn’t they? It would have put a stop back then to the rest of the compilation of the Bible.
If there would have been two accounts or even several accounts, one Jewish and one or several from any of those nations, Hittites, Philistines, or Edomite’s, it would have called into question all the Bible books.
Instead, because no one challenged the stories back then, and let the stories slide throughout history, we now have an “INSPIRED BOOK FROM GOD” and it’s very difficult to convince Christians and Jews, otherwise.
i been researching information on why the the conquest of canaan could not be a real historical account.
i found this on barts blog:.
when considering the historicity of the narratives of joshua, the first thing to re-emphasize is that these are not accounts written by eyewitnesses or by anyone who knew an eyewitness.
http://ehrmanblog.org/historical-problems-with-the-hebrew-bible-the-conquest-of-canaan/
photo was posted on jw-archive.
j.w.org flags flying at the 2015 r.c.
in fribourg, switzerland..
I guess it's the apostates that don't worship idols
photo was posted on jw-archive.
j.w.org flags flying at the 2015 r.c.
in fribourg, switzerland..
you can probably guess how this story goes.. i began dating a non-witness boy.
he knew i was a baptised witness and understood the consequences i faced for dating him.
we agreed to keep our relationship secret, which was easy considering our 200 mile distance.
What I'm struggling with is how I'm being disfellowshipped as 'an act of love.' I'm 18, and not even my own parents will talk to me, let alone my closest friends. I feel completely abandoned.
It is not an act of love.
Now that you are away, it is time to start doing research on the Watchtower. It will take some time and effort but it will help you understand why they act that way. You can start by going to JWFACTS.COM
Welcome by the way.
the financial collapse that might happen in greece---could it happen in the u.s. .
if so, how would it affect the watchtower?
or is the wt impervious to everything?
It almost was. We can thank the Obama administration for coming up with a ballsy plan that worked to keep us out of that mess brought on by 8 long years of Bush-Cheney fiscal ineptitude.
What would you say were the main “Things” that Obama did that kept us out of that mess?
I was still a JW 2 years ago so I never paid any attention to what Presidents did.